Playing with Data

Personal Views Expressed in Data

The Death of an Athletic Conference

Normally this blog is about weather topics. Tonight, I deviate…

In less than 24 hours, I believe we will be talking about the death of the Big-12 athletic conference. Rumors are flying tonight that the University of Oklahoma, the University of Texas, Oklahoma State University, and Texas Tech University will all be joining the PAC-16, with announcements on Monday. This undoubtedly was hurried by the announcement earlier this weekend that Syracuse University and Pittsburgh University had applied to join the ACC. This significantly weakens the football aspect of the Big East conference. Rumors are also flying tonight that the University of Connecticut is “aggressively” seeking membership in the ACC; I can only assume that Rutgers is doing the same. This will bring the ACC and the PAC-12 to 16 teams.

With two superconferences, I would expect to see the SEC expand. With Texas A&M already poised to join the SEC, leaving 13 teams, I would think that the SEC will seek to add Missouri (for television markets) as the 14th team. However, Missouri would much rather be in the Big-10 (for academic reasons), and if Notre Dame joins the Big-10 as the 13th team, Missouri might gain access as the 14th team. If Notre Dame doesn’t join the Big-10, I’d expect to see Missouri eventually join the SEC. With Baylor and Iowa State already making overtures to the Big East, I’d expect to see the remaining Big-12 and Big East schools align in a hastily arranged marriage for the sake of survival.

I know everyone will want to lay the blame of this round of conference realignment at the feet of the University of Texas and the Longhorn Network, but I think this is a bit short-sighted. Yes, this is what prompted Texas A&M to seek membership in the SEC, but that was as far as it would have gone if not for the public comments of the University of Oklahoma’s president, David Boren. His public comments about actively considering opportunities elsewhere, and suggestions of wanting to look west, made the rest of the collegiate landscape nervous. Much as the talk of the Big-12 disbanding caused Colorado to jump the Big-12 ship (prematurely) before being left behind last year, I believe that when all is said and done, comments made by President Boren set this entire cascade in motion. I hope I’m wrong, but it certainly doesn’t sound that way tonight.

On Any Given Saturday

Every Saturday during the fall, life in the southeastern United States comes to a stop. Attention turns toward college football and the escape from reality it offers. This break from reality has never been more needed for the city of Tuscaloosa, AL. Home to the University of Alabama, this city was devastated by a tornado during the historic 27 April 2011 tornado outbreak. Here’s a good story from ESPN on the impact of today’s Alabama-Kent State football game on the region.

One weekend in July, four Kent State players and a few athletic department officials came down to participate. One of them, senior running back Jacquise Terry, is from Phenix City, Ala., on the Georgia border. He played AAU basketball with Crimson Tide corner DeQuan Menzie.

“I have done Habitat before,” said Jacquise, who is minoring in construction management, “but I have never done it with players I compete with. That was the good part about it. We were able to put aside what we were about to do a month later and go in and help for a good cause. We fell right in together. They told us they appreciated us coming down. We bonded with those guys.”

Don’t Mock the Meteorologist

Meteorologists all across the country are having questions today regarding the perceived over-hyping of Hurricane Irene. Leaving aside the discussion about whether or not Irene was over-hyped, and who might actually be to blame (spoiler-alert: It’s not the meteorologists…), comedian Dean Obeidallah offers a defense of meteorologists in his opinion piece titled “Don’t Mock the Weatherguy

In short, Mr. Obeidallah offers this warning, “If we continue to mock these heroic weatherpeople who try to make our lives in a challenging world a little better, then don’t be surprised when, one day, we hear them collectively announce, ‘Enough!’” and leave the population “…like cavemen to predict weather based on the sounds of insects and our swollen feet.”

Meteorological Detective Work: Using All Your Tools

Tropical cyclones are giant, yet complex, heat engines driven by the release of latent heat. In a simplified context, here is how this heat engine works:

  • Thunderstorms develop over the warm tropical waters in an area of weak vertical wind shear. This results in thunderstorm updrafts being nearly 100% vertical.
  • As thunderstorms continue to develop, latent heat is released in the middle troposphere. As a result of this mid-tropospheric warming, updrafts become stronger.
  • Because air is rising faster than it is being replaced at the surface, the pressure at the surface decreases and a surface low-pressure develops.
  • As a consequence of the developing surface low-pressure, thunderstorms begin to congeal and rotate around a central point. Additionally, air at the surface begins to converge into the center of the low-pressure.
  • The increased surface convergence results in additional rising motion, meaning more thunderstorms, more latent heating, and further decrease in pressure.

Throughout all of this, the center of the tropical cyclone is located at the same horizontal location as a function of height. This is often referred to as a “vertically stacked cyclone”.

The processes described above continue until a balance is achieved, or something changes in the environment. Some negative environmental changes are cooler water temperatures (resulting in cooler, drier air being lifted), landfall, or an increase in shear. The reason an increase in shear is bad is because it tilts thunderstorm updrafts which acts to weaken the updrafts, in turn weakening the amount of latent heating.

The environment around Hurricane Irene has changed completely from a few days ago. Irene moved over land, is moving into cooler waters, and is experiencing an increase in vertical wind shear. How can I tell the latter? From utilizing the radial velocity from area Doppler radars.

In a radial velocity image, the wind is either toward or away from a point (in this case the point is the Doppler radar). In the image below the doppler radar is the black dot in the center of the image. Pixels that are green to blue in color depict air that is moving directly toward the radar with green pixels indicating slower motion than blue. Pixels that are red to orange in color depict air that is moving directly away from the radar with red pixels indicating slower motion than orange. Pixels that are grey in color indicate air that has no component of motion toward the radar. This does not mean that the air is not moving!. It simply means that the air is not moving toward the radar. It might be moving very quickly, but is completely parallel perpendicular to the radar beam! Utilizing this fact, the giant grey “S” like shape down the middle of the image means that the wind is predominantly parallel perpendicular to the radar beam at that location. The black arrows indicate the wind direction along the grey “S” like shape.

One other fact to remember about radar interpretation is that because the earth is curved, the radar beam actually increases in height as it moves away from the radar itself. Thus in the image below, areas near the periphery of the image are at a higher altitude than areas near the center. Combining this fact with the wind directions from the black arrows, we can infer that the wind is changing direction from east-northeast at the surface to almost due south at some higher altitude.

Before I'm bombarded with complaints, I do not mean to imply that the center of Irene is located at each of the L's exactly. It is merely an approximation of where the center may be with increasing height based on the cyclostrophic balance. Other forces are at play, especially since the cyclone is transitioning from tropical to extra-tropical.

Now, let’s think back to the heat engine process described above. If the tropical cyclone is “vertically stacked”, and we assume the wind is cyclostrophic (meaning it is perfectly circular) about the center of the tropical cyclone (which is a good first order approximation), the wind would be in the same direction no matter what height we examined! If we looked at a radial velocity image, the grey “line” would be a straight! This is not the case with Irene. In fact, using the cyclostrophic balance, we can determine the approximate tilt with height of the center of Irene. This is denoted by the giant “L” on the image above. (The short arrows between “L” locations indicates the path from surface to higher altitudes.)

This tilt with height indicates that Irene will most likely not strengthen (at least not significantly) as it moves back over the ocean. Furthermore, this tilt with height probably indicates that Irene is undergoing a transition from a tropical cyclone to an extra-tropical cyclone. However, discussion of the differences in the types of cyclone and the transition process will be left to a future blog post.

Update: Thanks to reader SRHelicity, a major typo has been identified and corrected. The initial version of this post said they grey S shape in the radial velocity image indicated the wind was parallel to the radar beam. It should have read that the wind was perpendicular to the radar beam. The original figure was correct and needed no change.

The NWS’ Sounding Paradox

The NOAA National Weather Service (NWS) Headquarters has issued a directive that all sounding sites in the southern, central, and eastern regions (along with Montana) are to launch soundings every 6-hours until further notice. The idea here is that the additional upper-air data will help improve numerical forecasts of hurricane Irene — and I fully agree. Ultimately, better observations being ingested into the model guidance should help model forecasts, as well as the NOAA National Hurricane Center with their forecast of the all-important question: Does Irene make landfall somewhere along the densely populated east coast of the United States? (I’ve listed the message below for your reading pleasure.)

So what’s the paradox? For years now the satellite community, as well as some inside the NWS, have argued that NWS Radiosonde (sounding) Program should be scrapped in favor of using satellite derived soundings — especially for numerical forecasts!. In fact, due to recent budget issues inside the federal government, every year there is talk of cutting, or drastically scaling back, the NWS Radiosonde Program in favor of satellite derived soundings. So here is my question:

If the satellite derived soundings are so good, why does the NWS feel the need to have 6-hourly launches for the foreseeable future to improve the numerical guidance of Irene?

I happen to work very closely with another national center that I’m sure would love to have daily 6-hourly soundings to help with their forecast responsibilities…

EDIT (0240 UTC, 25 August 2011): Don’t get me wrong, satellites have their place in aiding forecasters. However, nothing can take the place of observations, and the actions by the NWS speak louder than anything I could say.

000
NOUS42 KWNO 242215
ADMNFD

SENIOR DUTY METEOROLOGIST NWS ADMINISTRATIVE MESSAGE NWS NCEP CENTRAL OPERATIONS CAMP SPRINGS MD 2214Z WED AUG 24 2011

NWSHQ DIRECTIVE TO LAUNCH SIX-HOURLY RAOBS /SOUNDINGS/...

SDM IS HEREBY RELAYING A DIRECTIVE FROM NWSHQ FOR WFO/S IN ALL OF EASTERN..SOUTHERN AND CENTRAL REGIONS PLUS MONTANA IN WESTERN REGION TO LAUNCH SIX-HOURLY RAOBS /SOUNDINGS/ BEGINNING AT THU 25 AUG 06Z AND UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE. THIS DIRECTIVE IS TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL DATA INPUT WHICH SHOULD HELP WITH MODEL GUIDANCE IN FORECASTING THE FUTURE TRACK AND IMPACTS OF HURRICANE IRENE.

$$

STOUDT/SDM/NCO/NCEP